<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for THE MOTIVATION SOCIETY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>In partnership with the Institute of Motivation Studies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:01:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on MOTIVATION AND THE MANIPULATION OF OUR MINDS by themotivationsociety</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/motivation-and-the-manipulation-of-our-minds/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>themotivationsociety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/motivation-and-the-manipulation-of-our-minds/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Maybe one instinct is simply prevailing over another instinct, Jose ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe one instinct is simply prevailing over another instinct, Jose ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;THE MORAL INSTINCT&#8221; &#8211; MEGA MOTIVATION THEORY &#8211; A CRITICAL PRE-CONDITION FOR HUMANITY&#8217;S SURVIVAL &#8211; BY RICHARD W. SYMONDS by Jose</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 10:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Sexual modesty? Isn&#039;t this an oximoron? I cannot understand how sex can be modest. The most important right, after that of living, shouldn&#039;t have qualifying names.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sexual modesty? Isn&#8217;t this an oximoron? I cannot understand how sex can be modest. The most important right, after that of living, shouldn&#8217;t have qualifying names.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MOTIVATION AND THE MANIPULATION OF OUR MINDS by Jose</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/motivation-and-the-manipulation-of-our-minds/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 10:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/14/motivation-and-the-manipulation-of-our-minds/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the war on terror creating hatred? Isn&#039;t this hatred against our moral principles? Is there consequently a clash between our instincts and our morality?

From what I can see around me I&#039;d dare to say that particular instinct is prevailing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the war on terror creating hatred? Isn&#8217;t this hatred against our moral principles? Is there consequently a clash between our instincts and our morality?</p>
<p>From what I can see around me I&#8217;d dare to say that particular instinct is prevailing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;THE MORAL INSTINCT&#8221; &#8211; MEGA MOTIVATION THEORY &#8211; A CRITICAL PRE-CONDITION FOR HUMANITY&#8217;S SURVIVAL &#8211; BY RICHARD W. SYMONDS by themotivationsociety</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>themotivationsociety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>And this one about &quot;Human Universals&quot; is interesting - with the mention of Schopenhauer, Pinker, Chomsky et al :

http://mangans.blogspot.com/2007/07/human-universals.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this one about &#8220;Human Universals&#8221; is interesting &#8211; with the mention of Schopenhauer, Pinker, Chomsky et al :</p>
<p><a href="http://mangans.blogspot.com/2007/07/human-universals.html" rel="nofollow">http://mangans.blogspot.com/2007/07/human-universals.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;THE MORAL INSTINCT&#8221; &#8211; MEGA MOTIVATION THEORY &#8211; A CRITICAL PRE-CONDITION FOR HUMANITY&#8217;S SURVIVAL &#8211; BY RICHARD W. SYMONDS by themotivationsociety</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>themotivationsociety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your contribution, Jose. Appreciated.

I&#039;m still thinking about what you said...but in the meantime here&#039;s something about Marc Hauser (and Noam Chomsky) for you to think about :

http://www.current-biology.com/content/article/fulltext?uid=PIIS0960982207012523</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your contribution, Jose. Appreciated.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still thinking about what you said&#8230;but in the meantime here&#8217;s something about Marc Hauser (and Noam Chomsky) for you to think about :</p>
<p><a href="http://www.current-biology.com/content/article/fulltext?uid=PIIS0960982207012523" rel="nofollow">http://www.current-biology.com/content/article/fulltext?uid=PIIS0960982207012523</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;THE MORAL INSTINCT&#8221; &#8211; MEGA MOTIVATION THEORY &#8211; A CRITICAL PRE-CONDITION FOR HUMANITY&#8217;S SURVIVAL &#8211; BY RICHARD W. SYMONDS by Jose</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 09:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry to say, Richard, that I don&#039;t think morality has got anything to do with instinct, morality is an acquired trait, a product of society&#039;s habits and coexistence, not one a person is born with.

Instincts are never learned or thought of. They are naturally intrinsec to living beings.

But perhaps as Tyger says, we need a little more to know what you are really thinking of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to say, Richard, that I don&#8217;t think morality has got anything to do with instinct, morality is an acquired trait, a product of society&#8217;s habits and coexistence, not one a person is born with.</p>
<p>Instincts are never learned or thought of. They are naturally intrinsec to living beings.</p>
<p>But perhaps as Tyger says, we need a little more to know what you are really thinking of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;THE MORAL INSTINCT&#8221; &#8211; MEGA MOTIVATION THEORY &#8211; A CRITICAL PRE-CONDITION FOR HUMANITY&#8217;S SURVIVAL &#8211; BY RICHARD W. SYMONDS by themotivationsociety</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>themotivationsociety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Does this help, Aaron...

&quot;Why does everybody take for granted that we don&#039;t learn to grow arms, but rather, are designed to grow arms ?

&quot;Similarly, we should conclude that in the case of development of moral systems, there&#039;s a biological endowment which in effect requires us to develop a system of moral judgement and a theory of justice, if you like, that in fact has detailed applicability over an enormous range&quot; (Noam Chomsky - quoted in &quot;Moral Minds&quot; by Marc Hauser - Harper Collins - 2006).

That&#039;s what I want to write a book about - and applying Mega Motivation Theory to that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this help, Aaron&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Why does everybody take for granted that we don&#8217;t learn to grow arms, but rather, are designed to grow arms ?</p>
<p>&#8220;Similarly, we should conclude that in the case of development of moral systems, there&#8217;s a biological endowment which in effect requires us to develop a system of moral judgement and a theory of justice, if you like, that in fact has detailed applicability over an enormous range&#8221; (Noam Chomsky &#8211; quoted in &#8220;Moral Minds&#8221; by Marc Hauser &#8211; Harper Collins &#8211; 2006).</p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I want to write a book about &#8211; and applying Mega Motivation Theory to that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;THE MORAL INSTINCT&#8221; &#8211; MEGA MOTIVATION THEORY &#8211; A CRITICAL PRE-CONDITION FOR HUMANITY&#8217;S SURVIVAL &#8211; BY RICHARD W. SYMONDS by Aaron</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 07:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/22/the-moral-instinct-mega-motivation-theory-a-critical-pre-condition-for-humanitys-survival/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Need a bit more to go on, Richard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need a bit more to go on, Richard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE MOTIVES OF U.S. FOREIGN POLICY IN IRAQ by Jose</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/01/the-motives-of-us-foreign-policy-in-iraq/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/01/the-motives-of-us-foreign-policy-in-iraq/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s what&#039;s become of the BBC, a medium I always used to admire.

But I think this discussion which is centered on the US&#039;s behaviour re Iraq, should be deviated a little bit to express why the US has acted as the means, because the country has acted as the means of the oil companies and all other corporations interested in keeping oil as the main source of energy, for obvious reasons.

Matters, horwever, are becoming more and more difficult for Bush and Co.: the Turks massing up forces at the frontier, the oil unions striking to make the government stop the process of &quot;donating&quot; the oil to the international oilers, and on top of that the so-called insurgents - in my opinion patriotic guerrilla - suicide-bombing and otherwise-bombing around.

Let&#039;s think more in those corporations than in the US as a state whose inhabitants may not have anything to do with the invasion, if only a bit irresponsible for not having checked the lies spread by their rogue government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s what&#8217;s become of the BBC, a medium I always used to admire.</p>
<p>But I think this discussion which is centered on the US&#8217;s behaviour re Iraq, should be deviated a little bit to express why the US has acted as the means, because the country has acted as the means of the oil companies and all other corporations interested in keeping oil as the main source of energy, for obvious reasons.</p>
<p>Matters, horwever, are becoming more and more difficult for Bush and Co.: the Turks massing up forces at the frontier, the oil unions striking to make the government stop the process of &#8220;donating&#8221; the oil to the international oilers, and on top of that the so-called insurgents &#8211; in my opinion patriotic guerrilla &#8211; suicide-bombing and otherwise-bombing around.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s think more in those corporations than in the US as a state whose inhabitants may not have anything to do with the invasion, if only a bit irresponsible for not having checked the lies spread by their rogue government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE MOTIVES OF U.S. FOREIGN POLICY IN IRAQ by themotivationsociety</title>
		<link>http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/01/the-motives-of-us-foreign-policy-in-iraq/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>themotivationsociety</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 16:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themotivationsociety.wordpress.com/2007/06/01/the-motives-of-us-foreign-policy-in-iraq/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>The BBC has simply become the official State Broadcaster in this country - a kind of media propaganda agency of the Government and its Security Services - ever since Lord Ryder&#039;s abject apology to the Government (eg Alastair Campbell) - after the WMD scandal, the BBC Director General&#039;s departure and Dr David Kelly&#039;s death. 
&quot;Objectivity&quot; and truth-seeking are now concepts which are rarely witnessed within the BBC - tragically.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC has simply become the official State Broadcaster in this country &#8211; a kind of media propaganda agency of the Government and its Security Services &#8211; ever since Lord Ryder&#8217;s abject apology to the Government (eg Alastair Campbell) &#8211; after the WMD scandal, the BBC Director General&#8217;s departure and Dr David Kelly&#8217;s death.<br />
&#8220;Objectivity&#8221; and truth-seeking are now concepts which are rarely witnessed within the BBC &#8211; tragically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
